Food Library – Experiment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zF5Ys2Pw3c&feature=youtu.be

On Wednesday the 18th of February, we were asked to test out our idea for our final performance. Our idea is that during the day we set people who want a piece of food, a question or a riddle which relates to a certain book title or passage in the library. The reward for the correct answer is a snack of some kind.

In our miniature version, we tested out an example of a question and reward system with the groups in our class. Everyone in our group came up with a different question to test on the other groups. My task was: “Find a book that was written by a Drama Lecturer at the University of Lincoln in under 15 minutes”. The premise being that, even though we as students are taught by these lecturers, we are unaware of their work and how it is kept within the University Library. The group had to find the book without resorting to the dependency of technology and the search tablets within the library. Unfortunately the task turned out to be a lot easier than I had intended it to be, within no time at all they had found 1 of the 10 known books which were in the library. So, I gave them an additional task to try and find another book by a drama lecturer… which they did just as quickly as the one they found the one earlier. The group were very pleased with themselves, deservedly so, and were rewarded with their snack – a bag of sweets.

The simple idea behind the task is that students are motivated to learn through a physically active game as well the prospect of free food as an award. In my mind, it builds upon the idea of both: the metaphor “Food for Knowledge”, and the student food-reward system (where a student rewards themselves with food if they have completed the amount of work on their essay that they have done)

 

Paul Chappel

Let’s talk about books, baby

Since we are all going to be performing in and around the library, I felt it only natural to write something about books. Not just what we expect from a book, but also inclusion from what we have talked about in seminars where we questioned: What is a book?

So what do we expect from a book? Many pages together to form a novel, or a collection of stories or poems, or something informative. As much as someone may want to avoid books because they don’t like reading, it is hard to avoid them as we grow up with them, we learn from them in school and they can help to shape who we are. In fact, most of us will have had one when we were babies or toddlers and had them read to us from our parents. But also at this early age, they can help us to talk and read, so books are important to us as we grow up.

Books not only help to shape who we are as we grow up, but as we have grown up, we read more and more and learn more and more from the books we read. Even from fictional books we read as teens, the books we class as teen books, can help us understand things socially, help us find ourselves at a time in our lives when we really need to find out who we are. So for me, books are incredibly important to us as humans, so that we can develop and learn.

However, if we look at books from an academic perspective, then they help us learn, but in a completely different way. They help us have an understanding of the wider world and help us form an opinion on matters we may learn about, for example, from a personal perspective on academic learning, I found this in the first lecture for another module. We were told about the politics of teaching and how the arts were basically getting kicked out, and this made me form an opinion of a matter I previously had very little knowledge of.

But as we, as a group, have explored in seminars, books aren’t just something we read, they aren’t just the stereotypical object we fine in libraries or Waterstones, but could be a plastic food box filled with marshmallows and strawberries and inspiring quotes. They can be something we listen to, or even a plastic bottle filled with facts. It’s as if you could do anything and still call it a book as a book, seemingly, could be anything. Literally anything.

Andrew Brooks

Food for knowledge test run!

IMG_20150218_132651
Josh looking for the answer my question. In the Merry Wives of Windsor what are the mistresses names?
IMG_20150218_132840
So close!!
IMG_20150218_132908
Looking for the answer 😀

On Wednesday, 18 February we were asked to do a trail run of our idea piece that are to perform in our site-specific location of the library. Through a miniature version of our performance we decided that we were going to give people questions to find the answer to questions about certain library books. If they found the answer within a certain amount of time (10 minutes were allocated) they were given a piece of fruit or sweets as a reward. Finding knowledge and getting rewarded with food became quite a fun game to play in the library as lots of students like munching when writing essays in the library.

To help support our idea we started looking at Blast Theory. (Blast Theory, 2015). Blast theory looks at the concept of using site-specific work by the use of games. There was an example of “Can You See Me Now” where they used real-life people and people playing online.  It was a big game of  “ hide and go seek”. This example shows that a game can be used in a big city environment and shows that shows the link that people can have with computers in everyday life.

We were asked why we want to look at the link of food and knowledge. Our answer is that food is a basic necessity and that in modern society knowledge is becoming one of the key factors of everyday life as well.  In this University library trial run, these two crossed over in more ways than people realise. Nowadays when we study we use food as a reward after we’ve done a certain amount of work and if we can make students use the old way of finding knowledge, by just using a library book and no technology and reward them with food, they may go away from this experience with a new information without them realising it – due to them being rewarded with a basic everyday thing that is food.

The feedback that we got on our trial run is that fellow students were asking how it would be done. We were looking at using one of the library group rooms or some empty library shelves to indicate our base. Once a question was answered correctly and the ‘contestant’ picked his food reward from the shelf, the empty space would be filled with the book where the information had been found from.  Then this shows the sources of information the participants had used to gain the answers for the day by the use of the reward of food.

Blast Theory. (2015) Chronology. [Online] Brighton. Available from: http://www.blasttheory.co.uk/our-work/. [Accessed 12th March 2015].

Samantha Foster.

Theatre and Architecture: Introduction

In Juliet Rufford’s book, the introduction makes some valid points but, also some interesting points too that show the progression of architecture through the different periods of drama: early Greek theatre, the Restoration period and the modern era of theatres and the architectures influence over theatre.

Rufford notes that the change in architecture of theatres had a link to the change in the audience, which could ultimately change what happens on the stage. This can be seen from ‘the huge size of the ancient Greek amphitheatre [that] demanded large gestural acting.’ (Rufford, 2015, 3) In this period of time, the audiences would be huge and they attended open aired theatres, therefore the actors had to project much more, this is also the reason for the larger gestures on stage. However, Elizabethan theatres, by way of contrast, were much smaller, and from the Globe theatre to the Theatre Drury Lane, there were changes that included going from open aired theatres to indoor theatres, mostly stood to everyone being sat and natural lighting to artificial lighting.

From open aired theatres to the indoor theatres, the architecture of the theatre influences the acting and theatricality because the actors didn’t have to project their voices as much, because their voices aren’t disappearing into the open air. Therefore, the newer architecture of the indoor theatres forced the audience to listen, even if in the Restoration period the audience openly criticised the actors on stage during the performance, but this gave way to the parameters of the contemporary theatres we expect to see today.

‘But perhaps the most significant change of all was that the auditorium lights were turned down… [and]…in the dark, the sights and sounds of the auditorium were stilled.’ (Rufford, 2015, 6) This change in 1876 by Richard Wagner for his Bayreuther Festspielhaus was a game changer in how architecture influenced the way people acted at the theatre. In the Restoration period, the stage and audience were lit in equal lighting because of a lack of technology, although it was cutting edge for its era. Despite the fact no one in the audience would have known to be quiet when the lights went down, it seemed as though it was a natural thing to do, and this was a clear paving stone for what we now expect to see and be a part of in a theatre surrounding.

The technology and the change in design of the theatres have shown how the change in architecture has had a major influence on the expectations from what happens on the stage and the whole theatre experience.

 

Rufford, J. (2015) Theatre & Architecture. London: Palgrave.

 

Andrew Brooks

Experimental Task

We were given the task to Sit and Listen, Write down everything you hear. I decided to find an enclosed space near the entrance to the first floor and the stairwell.

-Humming is coming for the electrical lights

-Shoes/trainers are squeaking on the floor

-Wind coming through the far window

-Hard footsteps of people walking on the floors and getting louder when ascending or descending the stairs.

-Cars in the distance can be heard from the main road

-Laughing

-Buckles of shoes

-Talking -“£12.30”

– Talking – “And if I go out on a work night…” fades

-Trousers/clothes rustling

-The clattering of money in pockets

I found this task to be highly interesting, it enabled me to really listen and take in to account the thought that you could consider the sounds to be an approach to performance art.

Ruth Scott