Final Blog Submission – Set In Stone

Framing Statement

Our performance takes influence from physical performance art, sound art and sculpture. By combining all of these within our performance, we created a lot of layers and depth to our performance. Because we had so much within the performance we made sure that we kept each element of the performance simple enough to not distract from the main context.

 

When first approaching site specific we were entering a whole new world of performance. I knew buildings as a place where performance took place, however I never thought of Architecture as being performative itself. It was this performativity of buildings that first inspired our creative exploration. We spent time looking at the architecture of the library and the difference between the original architecture and the parts that had been added when it was transformed into a library. We decided to explore the staircase at the rear of the library because it is a space that is often over looked. People use the stairs all of the time but never pay attention to the performativity of the staircase itself.

 

The real power of site-specific work is that it somehow activates, or engages with, the narratives of the site in some kind of way. That might be with its formal architecture, or it might be with the character of the building. It might be to do with the history of that building. (McLucas cited Morgan, 1995, 47 cited Pearson, 2010, 35)

_

This quote was one of the main theories that fuelled my understanding of site-specific performance and my creativity when approaching the creation of our own performance.
The general concept behind our performance was the activation of the architecture through the use of the body and to include the present use of the building as a library.
The performance as a whole is an experiment which allows us to be constantly exploring ideas and creating new ideas to include in the performance.

__

For our performance we had three people with mod rock casts attached to them on each level of the stairwell. This was to explore the relationship between people and the site. Without people the site would stop being a staircase and become and empty room. This means that people are metaphorically a part of the building. By mod rocking ourselves to the building, it shows the metaphor in a physical instillation.
_
The other three people were continuously exploring the stairs and different ways to interact with them. We installed the body casts and left them throughout the day. We performed three times for twenty minutes during the day. Each time we performed, we switched positions allowing variety through the performance, meaning that no performance is the same. This is an exploration of the site in itself as it emphasises how the building has changed over time and how it is used differently every day, by different people.

_

The last part of our exploration was the sound collage that we had playing for the full twenty minutes of each physical performance. This sound collage, of walking up and down stairs, creates another level of exploring the use of the stairs. It explores the sound that the physical action of walking up and down stairs creates. This explores the rhythm of life and the rhythm of the stairs.

 

 

Analysis Of Process

My first inspiration came from a task that we were set in class. This task was to draw a part of the library and then switch drawings and create a transmedia response to said drawing.

_

I had to create a transmedia response to a drawing of the library’s steel support frame. I decided to create a sound collage in response as the first thing that came to mind was the transformation of the raw material being forged into a vital product for the building’s creation.

Below is the sound collage:

Here is some documentation of the process of editing the sounds.

sound edit 2

Because the sound recordings were taken at different times of the day I had to edit each clip individually so that they would run smoothly off one another.

Sound edit

 

This experiment allowed me to open my mind to the world of performance outside of the theatre conventions. To see performance not only as the intentional theatrical performance that follows conventions; but to look at the performativity of everyday actions and of objects. For example by physically creating an installation of objects the performance of putting said objects in a specific place for a specific reason and understanding what it will represent.

 _

From this we decided to look at different forms of performance art. Kira O’Reilly was one of the first artists that influenced us. Her work exploring the body and its environment was a bridge to us deciding to explore the body’s relationship with our site.

(Michael Pinchbeck, 2015)

#6 The Drawing Board: Re:Calling from traci kelly on Vimeo.

 

The sound used in this performance, linked with my past experiment with sound collages, caused us to include the sound collage of footsteps. The rhythm of the sound helps to emphasise the link that we are making between body and architecture. It does this by creating a strong atmosphere in which the performance takes place. The audience enter the atmosphere which automatically intrigues them and makes them really focus on and absorb the performance/instillation around them.

 

 _

Antony Gormley

The next piece of inspiration was from an artist called Antony Gormley. He is an artist that is well known for his exploration of body in relation to space through the medium of sculpture. He creates sculptures of the human body and presents them in different spaces that create different meanings.

REFLECTION II
REFLECTION II, 2008 Cast iron, 2 body-forms: each 191 x 68 x 37 cm Installation view, Kunsthal Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2008 Photograph by Bob Goedewaagen, Rotterdam

(Gormley, 2008)

 _

This was what sparked the idea to create body casts. Body casts seemed to be the best pathway for us as none of us had any skills in the art of sculpture. We started off by creating one hand cast, which we took to the site and explored its relationship with its surrounding. Straight away we were interpreting this in many different and interesting ways. The cast had a chalky texture and was pure white which invited us to think about the shape and history of the object.

_

We thought about the history of the library, a grain factory, and began thinking about the difference between the people that would have occupied the space in the past and the people that inhabit the space now. We decided that we needed to create more casts fill the space and show a better representation of the vast amount of people that have passed through the building.

_

We spend around 100 hours in the art department creating these casts, resulting in:

  • 60 books

  • 40 hands

  • 30 feet

  • 3 faces

Now with a substantial amount of casts we could go to site and begin experimenting with placement. We decided to cast feet, faces and books as well as the original hand trial. We cast the feet because of the relationship with the body and the stair case. Feet are the main body parts that activate the stairs.

_

We decided to cast a face as an experiment. The face cast experiment created another level to our performance. Because of the detail of the cast it created a feeling of a human imprint. This creates a relationship with the people who worked in the library in the past when it was a factory. When looking at this extremely detailed cast it gave off an earie feeling and was quite disturbing to look at in ways. It has no life in it, yet it looks so life like. It dehumanises the most human part of a person. This experiment was so successful that we continue to create 3 more.

_

The book casts created a link between the rest of the casts, focusing on the architecture and the past of the building, and the modern day use of the library. These casts were also extremely detailed, which made you really focus on the physicality of the books themselves, which is opposed to the usual value of the content and knowledge that the books hold. In this sense the books also become part of the human casts as they represent the education and craving of knowledge that separates humans from the rest of the animal world. This is what a library represents, and what we wanted to convey in our performance.

_

When we first explored the cast’s positioning within the site, we had the idea to place them on the stairs because this is the most active part of the site.

BLOG IMAGE 41
casts on the stairs

 

After consulting with the library staff we discovered that this was not a plausible option because of the trip hazard that it created (because the stairs were being used regularly throughout the day).

_

After receiving this news we had to place the casts around the stairs in more interesting and obscure ways to create the same effect. We placed the casts around the static performers and also around the multiple window ledges that cover each side of the staircase and ledges that thrust out of the original architecture of the building.

_

When we first installed the casts on these ledges we realised that it worked better than originally planned as the ledges represented the book shelves of the library and the idea of archiving.

BLOG IMAGE 53
Lilly placing a book cast on a ledge
Cast books on a window ledge

 

 

The idea of people creating a space, and space affecting people, is what brought us to the idea of having re-attachable mod rock casts that we could have on us. We wanted to convey the importance that people have to the building. People created the building and use the building. In this respect, people are part of the building. The building is designed and created to be compatible with the human body. By physically casting ourselves to part of the building we are physically representing this metaphor of being a part of the building. The fact that we used ourselves as part of the instillation as well as the casts represents the currant architecture of the library. The new and the old. The performers representing the newest parts of the library and the body casts representing the preserved history of the building.

_

This could also be representative of the amount of time that students spend in the library. Our audience, the vast majority of which are the students that use the library, would find this understanding a lot easier to read as some of the students spend hours on end in the library doing work and research. The people that spend a large amount of the time in the library become familiar with the building and begin to feel a connection with it. This ability to create relationships with objects and places as well as other people I one of the things that represent the human consciousness in a very bold manor. This makes people feel a part of the library as they feel a sense of ownership of their surroundings that they know so well. Our performance creates a physical image of this human emotion that people overlook.

 

 

The second part of our performance is the physical exploration of the stairs. During our exploration of our site we explored the stairs by truly thinking about their design and use. When people walk up and down the stairs they don’t think about what exactly it is that they are doing. They take it for granted and just focus on the level that they need to reach. Because we fully explore the variety of ways to go up and down the stairs we are highlighting the process that has to be completed when using stairs. One example of our exploration is that we slowly moved up and down the stairs focusing on our precise movement and on each individual step as its own physical object.

_

By adding this aspect of the performance we explored into further depth the relationship between body and architecture. The audience will watch us and in turn be forced to think about the action of walking on stairs and how they would scale the building without this essential feature of the building.

 

_

Michael Pinchbeck’s work on The Drawing Board was an influence that helped us add to our performance. We has heard about this work but had not applied it to our performance until very late on in our process. We took their idea of rolling chalk down the stairs and applied it to our own performance. On the last segment of our physical performance we took some of the casts that we had made and dropped them down the stairs. This was to explore the idea of the disintegration and decay.

_

Time causes decay and everything decays; buildings, people and ideas. The physical disintegration of our casts represent the disintegration of a building over time. It also represents the disintegration of the past from our minds. The building used to be a factory and has now been adapted into a library. A lot of people have no idea of the history of the building that they believe to know so well. The memories of the past decay along with the building and the people that used it. The body also decays over time. The physicality behind the crumbling of these casts over the architecture shows the relationship that everything has with the past and with time itself.

_

_

The Drawing Board worked very well as an influence for us because of the fact that they used chalk and our casts were made of plaster which has a very similar texture to chalk and leaves behind a chalky residue.

_

Costume was the last decision that needed to be decided upon. We had many ideas ranging from nudity to wearing pure white full body suits. Because we were representing the body and the architecture, the most effective way to convey this raw idea would have been through the body’s purist form (naked). We decided against this idea because of the fact that it would have been inappropriate for our specific site. The stairwell has windows completely covering each side which allows members of the public that walk by to see inside. This could have been indecent if any children or people who would be offended by nudity would walk past. We decided in the end to wear all white as it matched with the casts. This link between our costumes and the casts allowed the audience to associate the colour white with the form of the body for the entirety of the performance.

 

 _

Performance Evaluation

After the day of performing, I can confidently state that it was a success. We achieved our goals of exploring the performativity and relationship between body and architecture. As our performance itself was an experiment we managed to learn a different way of performing through creating an instillation, becoming part of an instillation and improvising the honest exploration of the stairs. Also the fact that we ourselves were experimenting during the performance allowed u to make sure that no performance was the same. By the time the third performance had come we had come up with new ideas and managed to explore these ideas as we performed. During the first two performances we didn’t touch the casts and we realised that this was a key part of the performance that we had missed. In the third performance we were a lot more active with the casts. This was when we rolled the casts down the stairs and analysed the deconstruction and disintegration of them. By the end of the performance we were left with a lot of fragmented casts that perfectly reflected the exploration of time and the change in the architecture and in the people that inhabit the building.

_

Another thing that we incorporated during the final performance was the movement of the books and casts. The building itself is forever changing and the people inside are forever moving and changing positions. We moved the books to different shelves and had the static performers interacting with them to create a stronger link between the body having a huge effect on the space and the use of the building.

_

I knew that we had created an interesting performance because as I was performing I realised that a lot of people outside were pointing and stopping to look at what was happening inside the stairwell. Also I noticed that a lot of people that were going to use the stairs would realise that something was happening; our performance must have sparked their interest because they would then return with more people to observe the performance.

_

Although we did get a lot of interest, we didn’t have a massive audience. A lot of the reasoning behind this would have been people not using that staircase very often, and being intimidated by their original image of the staircase that they know as being empty and quite.

 

 ________________

 

 

Bibliography

Gormley, A. (2008) Reflection II. [image] Available at: http://www.antonygormley.com/sculpture/chronology-item-view/id/2058/page/224#p1 [Accessed 18 Apr. 2015].

Michael Pinchbeck, (2015) #6 The Drawing Board: Re:Calling. Available at: https://vimeo.com/112927930 [Accessed 1 Apr. 2015].

Pearson, M. (2010) Site-specific performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Set in Stone! Final Blog Submission.

Set in Stone! Final Blog post by Abigail Earlie.

This blog post is all about my final thoughts and documentation about our Site Specific performance that took place on Saturday, 9th May at the University Library.

Framing Statement:

The Spectator in the space.’For we are where we are Not’  – Pierre-Jean Jauve, Lyrique

I found it interesting and useful to investigate the works and sculptures of the artist Antony Gormley for our site specific performance. I found his statues of the human body especially interesting, as it relates more to our site specific performance, as we are also looking at the use of body in sculptures to create a performance related to the architecture and history of the library building.  The sculptures used by Antony Gormley take up a substantial amount of room in the space used by the artist, however, the space isn’t cluttered by the sculptures but is light and open, and it’s clear to see that the artist had meaning to where and why he placed the sculptures in the space he did.  Each sculpture is created by different materials. I will research and look into with more detail, I believe that this will be useful to our performance as a source of inspiration as we could find other raw materials we could use to create our sculptures.Anthony Gormleys artwork investigates the relationship of the human body to space. He asks the question: Where does the human body stand in relation to nature and cosmos. I’m interested and excited about Antony Gormley’s work and I used his work as inspiration in our site specific performance.

For research for the performance I read this book, ‘Making Meaning In The Theatre’ by Gay McAuley. The main chapters that have been useful for my research are ‘The spectator in the space’ and ‘Objects in Performance.’  I have also been researched the artist Antony Gormly, who is a British sculptor from London, who has created many human and body sculptures from ‘rural’ materials. One of the sculptures I enjoyed looking at was called ‘Sculpture for an objective experience of architecture’ (2008), it was a sculpture that was created to examine architecture. As our performance is based on the architecture of the library and the human body we have chosen to Mod Roc body parts and place them in interested and unusual places on and around the libary stair case. Body parts and the image of body parts have been our groups main focus this week as we have researched the architecture to an extent and now are focusing on creating a decent amount of Mod Rock casts to place all over the library.  The results of our mod rocking in the past have been very good and the casts replicate real imitations of body parts. The casts when finished have a lot of detail and are very interesting to look at as well as looking very unusual. We created these mod rock casts in the Art studio on the University Campus and found that we can create a lot of material in the space and with the available materials that are on offer. Artist, Ken Clarke has worked in film studios creating human body sculptures for films. Life casting, is a mould created by materials mixed together and then shaped around a human body. These moulds can be placed anywhere and almost instantly they create new and unusual pieces of art. By taking the mould directly from the natural body, the mould casts are extremely lifelike with every detail and every  freckle is captured, this makes the casts unique and a performance a one and only. The casts of the body in these moulds create a record of the changes of the human body. A life cast can consist of a pregnant woman ranging to a child’s hands. In our performance we have chosen to take inspiration from Ken Clarke and we have experimented with the variations of body parts that can be cast, we choose to create human hands and feet made out of mod roc and plaster of Paris.

The basis of our site specific performance is to explore the body through space and time in the architecture of the building. The building we are exploring throughout our performance is the library and we will explore the library staircase in detail as we the performers travel up and down the staircase in a variety of ways. The staircase in this library is an interesting structure within the library. The surrounding walls show the history of the building and the aging, the wear and tare of the place.

When we explore the travelling of the body from the bottom of the staircase to the top of the staircase, we shall use a variety of methods to carry out our practise. We shall walk at different speed when travelling up and down the staircase. We have experimented at travelling at different speed up and down the library staircase and we found it to be a different and unusual way to explore the both body and architecture.

 

 

Analysis of Process

To prepare for our site specific performance, we spent week after week in the Art studio on campus and we developed a collection of mod rock and plaster casts. When we knew exactly what we were doing for our performance and what we wanted to do, we made a list of all the materials that we needed for the performance. These materials were: plaster or mod roc casts, (or both) grain and a collection of books of all shapes and sizes. The materials wasn’t too costly and we thought that it would be fairly easy to make these casts. We decided to not have grain during the performance, this is because of two reasons, one: the grain was difficult to purchase and expensive and two: the grain could have been a health and safety hard if we used it on the library staircase. So we decided against the grain and just used the materials from art needed for the plaster and mod roc casts and the books which we brought from charity shops. We got some of the books from the charity shops for free, as they were no good or they were extras in the shop. Getting as many materials for our performance for free was great because we needed the materials to be as cheep a possible as we needed a lot of books and casts and if we paid for all of these it probably would have cost a lot of money but luckily  Rob (who was in control of the art studio), let us use most of the material we needed. We only had to pay for one box of plaster and we shared the cost between the six of us.   The main materials we needed was the mod roc and plaster casts because they were the focal point of our performance. We decided that the mod roc and plaster casts were going to be figurations of the hands, feet and face on the human body. We decided to create hands, feet and faces because we spoke to the man in charge of the Art department and he told us we could make quite a few of these if we wanted to. We wanted to create a lot of these casts to make a bigger impact and to attract more attention. Our decision was to create a lot of mod roc and plaster casts so that we had a lot of material for our performance.  To create the mod roc and plaster casts, we went to the Art department at least three times a week, four times if necessary. To create the mod roc casts we would use plaster of paris and water and then mould them on a part of the body, for example, an arm or hand. We also made moulds of the books and then filled them with plaster liquid in order to create a hard, plaster mould. We would leave these books to set for a day and then take the mould off. The moulds of the books were detailed and even had the pattern and title of the book still left on the cast, these details made the performance even more interesting because they left an interesting pattern still on the cast. The plaster casts would be harder to make compared to the mod roc casts, especially when we peeled off the excess material that was used to shape the creations because we had to be very careful not to peel off any toes or fingers which were very fragile. We knew that we wanted to explore the architecture of the library staircase through our bodies and that the connection between body and sculptures was the hands and feet. During the performance we travelled from the bottom of the staircase to the top of the staircase in different speeds, for instance, one of us would either walk up the staircase very slowly, exploring the time as well as the architecture and then one of us would travel up the staircase as fast as we could. When travelling at different speeds, we would be exploring the time it takes to travel at these different speeds, how long would it take to travel up the staircase very slowly? How long would it take to travel up the staircase if I ran? What complications would these bring? We were a little worried that we would not have enough casts a week before our performance so we decided to go to the Art studio four times in the final week before our performance and we created more books, more hands and more feet. I think that our group had a lot of enthusiasm for this performance because we would meet at least three times a week in the art studio and create more sculptures and during the final weeks before the performance we met four times a week. The challenges of site specific performance were in the first couple of weeks after the seminars. We came up with challenges of where are we going to perform, how can we make this interesting, how can we justify what we are going to do? After we came up with these problems our enthusiasm started to die because I think we wanted to have a reason why were we doing this. But once we started to stop thinking and start exploring, we began to enjoy site specific again and we started to have new ideas and new ways of looking at the building. We found the staircase interesting because this is a space that is probably the most quiet part of the library because on the floors there is typing of keyboards and people talking with their friends about essays, but the stairwell is quiet most of the time, I think it’s a unique open space that would be very practical for a site specific performance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Evaluation:

The performance of our site specific took place on the 9th May, Saturday at 4:30, 5:30 and 6:30 on the staircase of the University Library. We had three twenty minute performances with a forty minute break.   To begin with we arranged the mod rock pieces all over the library stairwell, the only place we wasn’t allowed to put them was on the actual stairs as this was a health and safety hazard. We placed the mod rock and plaster casts in the windows, on the floor and on interesting architecture of the library staircase. It was important for us not just to place the casts anywhere, but to make sure we placed them significantly in the and around the library. Each place for the sculpture had a meaning. As we made our casts of body parts out of mod rock and plaster, some of our sculptures had broken while in storage. The broken sculptures were not a disadvantage because we still used them in our performance and in fact became more interesting to look at because they were broken and deformed. While we were performing, climbing and travelling up the library staircase during the performance, I noticed a few people surprised and interested in what we were doing, they seemed to stop and take note to what was going on, they even took the time to take photographs and to document the mod rock casts! I was very impressed with this, if they are taking pictures of our performance and our casts then this means that our performance is grabbing their attention and this is exactly what we wanted! We wanted to grab their attention as much as we could so that they take note in what we were doing, to make them think, so they would examine the relationship between body and architecture.  As we were all dressed in white, and completely focused on the architecture, while we explored the building and I think our focus made the people and students of the library take note as to what we were doing. The result of having a lot of casts of the body, broken hand casts and casts of books placed all over the library staircase, resulted in most of the students that walked past noticing the performance happening on the staircase. This is exactly what we wanted! The disfigured hands (as a result from storage) with broken fingers, looked very unusual but also very interesting. We placed some of the fingers that had broken off in unusual places on the library staircase. For example, we placed five fingers, (standing upright), on a ledge of concrete on the wall of the library. This gave a very eerie effect and again I hope it caught the imagination of the students that were walking through the library. I think that the students that saw this performance on the staircase made them think and use their imaginations. I would hope it made the audience have a broader view of what performance can and might be. This performance didn’t conform to the usual conventions of what normal performance can be, but this was a performance based in an unusual location, performed in an unusual and creative physicality and involved casts of the human body. Some members of the audience that watched the performance took photos and seemed to be very interested in what was going on. After the performance, when we were cleaning the bits of plaster that what left on the staircase, some students came up to us and asked what we were doing and seemed to be very interested. We told them what our performance was about and that this performance was site specific and we were exploring the site, the architecture of the building by using our bodies. We were very happy about this interest because this means that people had thought about what we were doing and why we was doing. Again, hopefully this makes students have a broader view on what performance may mean. We made the decision to wear all white clothes, no shoes and no makeup. We did this to blend in to the background and allow the focus to be on the only parts that were on show, our hands and feet. This performance was different to the other performances I have done, but I have enjoyed it. I enjoyed exploring a new performance space and have learnt that performance doesn’t have to just take place in a theatre, it can take place in unusual and interesting places were there will be an audience who may never see performances, but because it takes place in somewhere very public they get to see a unique performance. I think with site specific, the audience will have two opinions, they will either enjoy the originality or find it a waste of time. Our audience (I hope) enjoyed the originality of the performance because they were investigating and taking photos of the mod roc and plaster casts. I enjoyed the exploration of site specific, I enjoyed finding a new space and researching the history, exploring all the aspects of the architecture, but I think the most exciting part of site specific was understanding that performance can be a number of different things. I never thought that we would enjoy site specific as much as we did, but we really enjoyed creating the mod roc casts, the plaster casts and we enjoyed the physicality of exploring the staircase during the performance. At first, I think the audience were shocked to see this performance happening, but I only think this because they had probably never seen any performance like this happening in this location. We didn’t get in the audiences way, I don’t think we annoyed them and I think they enjoyed seeing us perform. Spite specific has made me realise that a performance can take place in the most unusual of spaces, as long as you make the connection and find something interesting to show and something to make the audience think a performance is nearly always possible. Research is important in site specific, also understanding the space and what you are trying to make the audience think about during and after the performance. Performance Evaluation

Overall, I was very happy with how the performance went and was welcomed in the library. I learnt that a performance doesn’t have to have a stage and be all theatrical to make it a performance. All a performance needs is a site to perform and an audience to understand. After this site specific performance and the feedback we got from the students that saw this performance, I would definitely think about performing in another unusual and interesting site.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works Cited:

Pearson, M. (2010) Site Specific Performance. London. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wroe, N. (2005) Leader of the Pack. The Guardian. [Online. London. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2005/jun/25/art 11255740_853749481372495_7985057558849659441_n 11246585_853749428039167_7296027359570228926_n 11231146_853749274705849_915944828378048843_n 11034305_820425554704888_7355767115900333921_n 11026006_820425578038219_4257638629626649450_n 11022559_820425698038207_1507862591962557923_n 11010297_853749311372512_2252905040881504989_n

EXPLORATION OF LINCOLN
Throughout the first site specific lesson we explored Lincoln to try and discover new places that we might not have been to. We were split into groups then given a list of things we needed to find which ranged from worst place to rough it, to best place to go sledging, best place to see an old couple holding hands and so on. The point in the exercise was to help us see things around us we may not have noticed before and to learn about our city.
This exercise was helpful because it allowed for me to see the city in ways I had not in the past and I feel it did help me increase my observational skills as by looking for items on the list it allowed me to think of places in a way I hadn’t previously thought of. An example of this was when we were able to find an old couple holding hands, this was a task we thought we would find difficult however we were able to find this relatively quickly in a location that we pass on a regular basis.

Exploration of the library
The next few sessions we followed up our exploration of Lincoln by exploring the library where we will be performing. We applied the same sort of practices to this where we search and try to notice rooms/places we had never noticed previously. While exploring I found several rooms such as the Zibby Garnett Library. By searching for these rooms I had to explore parts of the library I hadn’t previously been to. It also allowed for me to learn about some history to the library. By looking at a picture of the library before the extensions were added it allowed us to go outside and see where the extensions were as well as being able to see from the inside where these extensions are.
By going to all of these different places in the library it gave me a better idea of what there is to work with in the library in terms of creating a performance. Another part of our exploration of the library was exploring the sounds within the library. An exercise I did was listening to the sounds of the library. I decided to do this exercise on the 3rd floor of the library (the quiet floor) so that I could see how quiet it really is. Here is everything I heard.
• Fan from the air con
• Pages turning
• People packing their stuff to leave
• Food packets rustling
• Mouse’s clicking
• Printers
• Birds outside
• Chairs creaking
• Sneezing
• Phones going off
• Bottles being crunched
• Paper rustling
• Bags being zipped
• Cars outside
• Train barrier alarm
• Pens clicking
• Train
• Pages turning
• Rain coat movement.
These sounds showed that the 3rd floor isn’t actually as quiet as you would expect. I found that these sounds were quite irritating and annoying. This gave me an idea about possibly doing a performance where I can utilise these sounds in a smaller space where there is one person sat still and then in this confined spaces these sounds are made in a way to irritate.

Library Exploration continued
We continued our exploration of the library by finding a place in the library and drawing it. The place I sat was the food zone. I chose this because it is somewhere in the library I had not been before or even noticed, I had just assumed you could take food to the tables you were on. From there I focused in on the shelving and beams in the library. From doing this I noticed the detail that was around the library and one again I found myself seeing things is had never noticed before. One of these things were the ladders used to reach books on higher shelving. Once again because I had never had to reach anything on a higher shelf I had never thought about how to get these books down.
After we had drawn our section of the library we took somebody else’s drawing and we re-imaged that the picture I took was of a door. The part I focused in on was the door itself. This is because I was interested on what could have been behind this door. This was a no student access area and there are so many parts to the library that I have only just found out about even though it is a place I have been using for nearly 2 years. We then had to digitalise the image and so I took a photo of an open door to express how open doors can lead to new possibilities the same way that an open book can.
Also in this session we watched a video of a town crier called out news however the news was a reflection on social media because the crier was shouting about his dinner and other irrelevant stories. The same as how people on social media post about their dinner and news that no one really cares about. Following this we watched a video of Christo and Jeanne-Claude wrapping the Reichstag in Germany. This symbolised how when something is covered over it can be anything it doesn’t have a main purpose. There is also the feeling that they are blinding parliament to the outside world, a metaphor which is often said. This gave me another idea, could I possibly cover a room in the library with something transforming it into a different place with a different purpose.

Rehearsal on the 3rd floor
On the 17th of March our group was able to book the space on the 3rd floor. We booked the space and began to create a model of the library on a much smaller scale to the one we plan on building in our final piece and out of much lighter materials. This exercise allowed us to gain a rough time gage of how long it took us to build a small section of the library. With that taking us nearly 2 hours we know that building the lager heavier model will probably take more time than the day we originally thought now we believe it will take somewhere between 2 and 3 days.

Presentations
We presented our idea for our project to the library staff and Conan. After we had told them about our idea to turn the library into a workshop and build a model of the library to represent the manual labour activities it got a varying response. The concept works and the idea of turning the library into a workshop was an idea which had a lot of potential to work with. The idea of building a miniature version of the library was not as strong because of the amount of detail and lack of model making experience we as a group had. After brain storming new ideas we landed on the idea of making shelving. This seemed like the most logical choice because they are simple to make, and could also be would be cost effective. The only tools required are a hammer, saw, nails, wood and varnish. This meant we wouldn’t have to get screws, screwdrivers, adhesives and drills as well.
Shelves also seemed a logical choice because they are something that is related to the library and they could somehow be used and stacked to create our own library. The concept has also been able to remain the same and we would be able to monitor the noise levels and attempt to dull the noise of the tool to follow the rules of quiet in the library.

Creating our first shelf
We build our first design out of cardboard and we were able to create something that looked effective and was easily stackable. We also found our dimensions and how wide and deep the shelf would be, this allowed us to figure out how many shelves we would be able to make out of a sheet of wood. And how much we will be spending on wood. We figured that for a £20 sheet we could make us between 20 and 30 shelves.
The next step was building a shelf. We were able to acquire some cut offs of wood and attempt to build our first shelf. This however did not go as well as we first thought. The wood was all cut to a correct size however while assembling the shelf we assembled in in a way that wouldn’t fit together how it should and we ended up with a box as opposed to our design. Another problem we found was the wood splitting this was because the nails we had used were too thick.
This allowed us to get our next shelf correct and we were able to create the shelf to our measurements. One thing we did find a problem with was the shape of the shelf we had a few edged which were not even with each other so we realised we would have to start sanding as well. We found after sawing the amount of dust which came from one shelf. This gave us the idea to jar the saw dust and put them of the finished shelves. This would act as the data that our library would record and store on the shelves, showing the different amounts of dust that came of each shelf.

Sound and Audacity
When we knew about the noise levels we were making with the tools normally we were then able to start applying equipment to soundproof the tools and seeing how the noise levels alter on audacity. Our quietest object so far has been the combination of dusters and sponges. These nearly halved the amount of noise that audacity was picking up, however still sounded loud to the natural ear. We then tried doing this with microphones and adjusting levels on them to create our soundscape. This worked because the combination of sawing and hammering created a sound scape that sounded accurate to workshop conditions through wireless headphones and would nicely remind us of the sounds that would have at one time occurred within the library.

Work in progress
For our work in progress we were able to get the free zone for the morning. While we had this space we were able to find out what would work and what wouldn’t. We felt as a group the work in progress was a success. We were able to accomplish a rough time scale per shelf and were able to get the input of people outside the project and get feedback which was mostly positive. The positive feedback was about the concept and the idea that we have come up with from an artistic standpoint however the negative feedback came from people critiquing our actual skills with the tools and the levels on the mic.
We did encounter problems while we were constructing the shelf. Namely fatigue. We started to feel ourselves getting tired from the sawing the wood and found ourselves changing who sawed on a regular basis. This bought up the idea of possibly including tea breaks in the performance where we can focus a microphone and bring in some other sounds to the performance, while allowing us to pace ourselves and not wear ourselves down.
One thing that did not come across clearly was the soundproofing of the hammer. It wasn’t really made clear what I was doing to it. However what did come across nicely was the slight sound dulling from a sponge and gaffer tape. This is something I would like to follow up on and need to try and highlight more.
The only other issue we came across was us forgetting a few things such as tape measure and spirit level. This did affect our finished product, however despite this I feel confident about the performance. I believe the next step for us is to now create more than one shelf and find new things to put within the space.

Bone Library
Bone Library was performed at Spill festival. It was performance where aboriginal words get carved into bones. The bones then get categorised into alphabetical order. I feel like this could influence our performance. The way she categorises bones could be bought into our piece. We could categorise our shelves by labelling how long it took them to create or by the average noise made by 1 shelf. We could show this by gathering sawdust into a jar and labelling that jar.
By doing this the performance then becomes us gathering data as well as and information as well as representing the manual labour that used to be involved in the warehouse and keeping the noise down to follow library rules. By gathering data we are also able to represent what people do at a library which is to store data in their heads. The time our piece is being performed benefits the data message especially because it is a time where the library will be full of students researching for deadline essays.
Spill Festival (2014) Bone Library. [Online] available from http://spillfestival.com/show/bone-library/ [accessed 28 April 2015].